Isn't It Romantic Reviews



  • Isn't It Romantic
    • Genre : Romance, Comedy
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : PG-13
    • Duration : 88 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : -
    • Studio : Warner Bros. Pictures
    • Official Site : http://www.isntitromantic-themovie.com/
    • Reviews Rate
      Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.

    • Readers Rate
      N/A

Movie Reviews

  • every trope, twist, and trick of the genre is up for skewering in Todd Strauss-Schulson's laugh-a-minute comedy, but it's also got real heart: the film keeps things light and smart, never dipping into darkness or crass jokes
    Review rate : B+ by Kate Erbland [Indiewire ]
  • an utterly charming rom-com; Isn't It Romantic pulls off a sweet sleight-of-hand trick as a rom-com-within-a-rom-com, mocking all of the classic rom-com tropes while still letting us indulge in them; it's just funny and fun!
    Review rate : B+ by Dana Schwartz [Entertainment Weekly ]
  • a sassy-sweet sendup with Wilson making the most of her first major leading role
    2.5 of 4 by Rafer Guzman [Newsday ]
  • a glossy fantasyland of rom-com cliches; Strauss-Schulson persuasively conjures a vividly imagined fantasyland, as well as a spirited goofiness amid the real-world grit
    by Sheri Linden [The Hollywood Reporter ]
  • "Isn't It Romantic" walks the line between subversive and sendup. It gleefully makes fun of the well-known tropes of romantic comedies, while also satisfying our desire to delight in said tropes
    2.5 of 4 by Katie Walsh [Los Angeles Times ]
  • "Isn't It Romantic" isn't romantic, and it isn't funny. It's a bad idea stretched to feature length, a gimmick picture that never gets past its gimmick and never grows into something better
    1 of 4 by Mick LaSalle [San Fransisco Chronicle ]
  • "Isn't It Romantic" constantly reminds us of superior rom-coms --everything from "Pretty Woman" to "When Harry Met Sally" to "500 Days of Summer"-- over the course of a sloppily written story that fails as both romance and comedy
    1.5 of 4 by Peter Howell [Toronto Star ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image