2012 Reviews



  • 2012
    • Genre : Sci-Fi
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : PG-13
    • Duration : 158 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : 260
    • Studio : Columbia Pictures
    • Official Site : http://www.whowillsurvive2012.com/
    • Reviews Rate
      Not quite bad, but it's not recommended either.

    • Readers Rate
      4 of 5

Movie Reviews

  • will leave audiences tapping their toes and wishing that something would just erupt for heaven's sake
    1 of 4 by Linda Barnard [Toronto Star ]
  • watching "2012" is like watching a sausage machine explode
    2.5 of 4 by Jeff Shannon [Seattle Times ]
  • sheer, cynical, mind-numbing, time-wasting, money-draining, soul-sucking stupidity
    1 of 4 by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone ]
  • No surprises
    2 of 4 by Robert W. Butler [Kansas City Star ]
  • long and boring
    1.5 of 4 by James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]
  • It's one huge, overlong, cornball Armageddon - a work of shlock and aw
    2 of 4 by Ty Burr [Boston Globe ]
  • If you're willing to let go of outmoded values like "plausibility" and "narrative," you'll find plenty to love in "2012"
    3 of 4 by Colin Covert [Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune ]
  • disaster
    Review rate : C by Gary Thompson [Philadelphia Daily News ]
  • antithesis of Bay's "Transformers" films, McG's "Terminator" sequel and Sommers' "G.I." movie
    2.5 of 4 by Jeff Vice [Deseret News ]
  • "2012" isn't just plagiarizing other movies, it's plagiarizing itself
    2 of 4 by Stephen Whitty [Newark Star-Ledger ]
  • 3 of 5 Reviewed by Christopher Null [Filmcritic.com ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Carrie Rickey [Philadelphia Inquirer ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Joe Williams [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
  • 1.5 of 4 Reviewed by Duane Dudek [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ]
  • 1.5 of 5 Reviewed by Bill Goodykoontz [Arizona Republic ]
  • Reviewed by Manohla Dargis [NY Times ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image