The Twilight Saga's Breaking Dawn Part I Reviews
- Home > Movie
> T
> The Twilight Saga's Breaking Dawn Part I
> The Twilight Saga's Breaking Dawn Part I Reviews
-
- Genre : Romance, Thriller, Drama
- Release Date : November 18, 2011
- MPAA Rating : PG-13
- Duration : -
- Production Budget : -
- Studio : Summit Entertainment
- Official Site : http://www.breakingdawn-themovie.com/
Reviews Rate :
Readers Rate :
-
you won't be surprised, if you've read the books
by Linda Holmes [NPR ]
-
too scattered to have anything like an agenda; it's incoherent and dopey and feverishly overdramatic
by Dana Stevens [Slate ]
-
this first part of the saga's two-part finale promises more hilarity to come
by Rafer Guzman [Newsday ]
-
the narrative goes flat and the ensemble's line readings turn to wood
by Justin Chang [Variety ]
-
the movie is long and uniquely bad
by Wesley Morris [Boston Globe ]
-
the last twenty minutes of Breaking Dawn are so harrowing that it’s possible to forget that most of the acting is soap-operatic
by David Edelstein [New York Magazine ]
-
the film is like a crab cake with three or four bits of crab surrounded by loads of bland stuffing
by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter ]
-
the film doesn't have nearly the bite - ferocious or delicious - that any self-respecting vampire movie really should
by Betsy Sharkey [Los Angeles Times ]
-
that all of the tedious exposition has been gotten, glacially, out of the way, "Part II" will probably be terrific
by Stephen Whitty [Newark Star-Ledger ]
-
sexless, bloodless, padded and plodding
by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone ]
-
overall the film is goofy, slight, without a truly deep thought in its pretty little head
by Bill Goodykoontz [Arizona Republic ]
-
now really an “R” picture under a “PG” label, and it’s an uncomfortable fit
by Peter Howell [Toronto Star ]
-
masks its genuine perversity under layers of artifice and saccharine melodrama
by Andrew O'Hehir [Salon.com ]
-
if by several lengths it is the best of the Twilight movies it is because it has the best story to tell
by Carrie Rickey [Philadelphia Inquirer ]
-
everything's all soap-operatic close-ups
by Sara Stewart [New York Post ]
-
at nearly two hours, the film is too long
by Scott Bowles [USA Today ]