Serenity Reviews



  • Serenity
    • Genre : Action, Sci-Fi, Adventure
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : PG-13
    • Duration : 119 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : 40
    • Studio : Universal Pictures
    • Official Site : http://www.serenitymovie.com
    • Reviews Rate
      Go! Watch this movie. You'll regret if not seeing it.

    • Readers Rate
      5 of 5

Movie Reviews

  • won't mean much to anyone but diehard fans of Firefly.
    2.5 of 4 by Robert Sims [Hollywood ]
  • ultimately too insular to have mass appeal.
    2 of 4 by Pam Grady [Reel ]
  • This second chance deserves a third.
    3.5 of 4 by Robert K. Elder [Chicago Tribune ]
  • quite possibly one of the year's best films.
    5 of 5 by Scottie [Iofilm ]
  • one of the most satisfying action movies
    4 of 5 by Rich Cline [Shadows on the Wall ]
  • more interesting and heartening than anything you'll find in George Lucas's Star Wars films.
    2.5 of 4 by Ed Gonzalez [Slant Magazine ]
  • is OK, but it's not better than an average episode from any of Whedon's TV vehicles,
    3 of 5 by Gerry Shamray [Sun Newspapers of Cleveland ]
  • definitely an entertaining and thought provoking sci-fi film
    4 of 5 by Kushmeer Farakhan [Movieman's Guide to the Movies ]
  • an early contender for the worst movie of 2005
    1.5 of 5 by Lee Tistaert [Lee's Movie Info ]
  • a spirited mix of the familiar and the futuristic, of fast-paced chase scenes and butt-kicking brawls, of witty banter and well-drawn characters.
    3 of 5 by Christy Lemire [The Hartford Courant ]
  • a solid enough big screen debut
    8 of 10 by Scott Chitwood [Comingsoon ]
  • a hipper, funnier, action-packed throwback to the original ``Star Wars.''
    3 of 4 by James Verniere [Boston Herald ]
  • 5 of 5 Reviewed by Andrea Chase [Killer Movie Reviews ]
  • 4.5 of 5 Reviewed by Philip Wuntch [The Dallas Morning News ]
  • 4.5 of 5 Reviewed by [E! Online ]
  • 4 of 5 Reviewed by Scott Brown [Entertainment Weekly ]
  • 4 of 5 Reviewed by Joe Williams [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
  • 4 of 5 Reviewed by Sean Axmaker [Seattle Post-Intelligencer ]
  • 4 of 5 Reviewed by Robert Denerstein [Denver Rocky Mountain News ]
  • 3.5 of 5 Reviewed by Kimberley Jones [Austin Chronicle ]
  • 3.5 of 5 Reviewed by Annlee Ellingson [Boxoffice Magazine ]
  • 3 of 5 Reviewed by Ida Ibricevic [The Cinema Source ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Louis B. Parks [Houston Chronicle ]
  • 3 of 5 Reviewed by Eric Lurio [Greenwich Village Gazette ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]
  • 3 of 5 Reviewed by Chris Barsanti [Filmcritic ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Jeff Vice [Deseret News, Salt Lake City ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Daniel Fienberg [Zap2it ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Michael Machosky [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Jan Stuart [Newsday ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Elizabeth Weitzman [New York Daily News ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Brooke Helgerson [The Boston Phoenix ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Wesley Morris [Boston Globe ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Duane Dudek [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Rob Owen [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ]
  • Reviewed by Sheri Linden [The Hollywood Reporter ]
  • Reviewed by Steve Schneider [Orlando Weekly ]
  • Reviewed by Richard Jinman [The Sydney Morning Herald ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image