- CELEBRITY
- 08:10 AM, Apr 18
you know what isn't terrifying? Mules. Also not terrifyingReview rate : c- by Keith Phipps [AV Club ]
trots out the tired old beliefby Ed Gonzalez [Slant Magazine ]
too many wrong chords during its final quarter hourby James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]
those wanting to see a film devoid of cliches and implausibility should look elsewhereby Peg Aloi [Boston Phoenix ]
the movie's primary pleasure is Hopkinsby Ty Burr [Boston Globe ]
the movie is so slowed by talk, unnecessary characters and some odd symbolismby Scott Bowles [USA Today ]
Please, no sequels!by Steven Rea [Philadelphia Inquirer ]
might have been more affecting if the performances gave just a hint that its histrionics were more than thatby Sara Maria Vizcarrondo [Boxoffice Magazine ]
If William Friedkin's 1973 The Exorcist is the genre's benchmark, this is its punchlineby Bill Gibron [Filmcritic.com ]
commits the supreme sin of making the devil dullReview rate : D by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly ]
becomes more ludicrous as it goes alongby Frank Scheck [Hollywood Reporter ]
a workmanlike B-movie that embraces as many of the genre's clichesby Stephen Holden [NY Times ]
a slow-burning horror flickby Andrew O'Hehir [Salon.com ]
a largely low-key, intelligent effort with midrange commercial potentialby Joe Leydon [Variety ]