Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Reviews



  • Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
    • Genre : Adventure, Fantasy
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : PG-13
    • Duration : 150 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : 308
    • Studio : Warner Bros.
    • Official Site : http://www.gobletoffire.com/
    • Reviews Rate
      Go! Watch this movie. You'll regret if not seeing it.

    • Readers Rate
      5 of 5

Movie Reviews

  • the best of the quartet of Harry Potter features
    3 of 4 by James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]
  • the best of the four
    by Chris Tookey [Australian News Network ]
  • succeeds on an enormous level of visual and classic storytelling, a solid direction and a wonderful cast of eclectic British actors
    4 of 5 by Jason Whyte [EFilmCritic ]
  • still a highly entertaining 2 1/2 hours
    4 of 5 by Andrea Chase [Killer Movie Reviews ]
  • manages to entertain, shock and surprise
    4 of 5 by David Mercier [FilmJudge ]
  • does feature some great performances, young romance, and spectacular action scenes
    9 of 10 by Scott Chitwood [Comingsoon ]
  • as magical a night at the movies as you could hope for
    4 of 4 by David Edwards [London Daily Mirror ]
  • an intelligent, visually seductive and mostly very satisfying fantasy epic of the first order
    4.5 of 5 by William Arnold [Seattle Post-Intelligencer ]
  • an extremely enjoyable experience
    4 of 5 by Matthew Turner [ViewLondon ]
  • although it is still a picture worth seeing, it stands as one of the weaker chapters in the Potter series
    3 of 5 by Bob Grimm [Sacramento News & Review ]
  • a focussed, efficient film that lacks charm but gets the job done
    4 of 5 by Paul Arendt [BBC Films ]
  • 5 of 5 Reviewed by Joe Utichi [FilmFocus ]
  • 4.5 of 5 Reviewed by [E! Online ]
  • 4.5 of 5 Reviewed by Mike Jackson [The Cinema Source ]
  • 4.5 of 5 Reviewed by Chris Vognar [The Dallas Morning News ]
  • 4.5 of 5 Reviewed by John Urbancich [Sun Newspapers of Cleveland ]
  • 4 of 5 Reviewed by Rich Cline [Shadows on the Wall ]
  • 4 of 5 Reviewed by Christopher Null [Filmcritic ]
  • 4 of 5 Reviewed by Eric Lurio [Greenwich Village Gazette ]
  • 4 of 4 Reviewed by [The Filmiliar Cineaste ]
  • 4 of 5 Reviewed by Joe Williams [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
  • 3.5 of 5 Reviewed by Christine James [Boxoffice Magazine ]
  • 3.5 of 4 Reviewed by Joyce Millman [The Boston Phoenix ]
  • 3.5 of 4 Reviewed by James Verniere [Boston Herald ]
  • 3.5 of 5 Reviewed by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly ]
  • 3.5 of 4 Reviewed by Michael Wilmington [Chicago Tribune ]
  • 3 of 5 Reviewed by James Christopher [The Times of London ]
  • 3 of 5 Reviewed by Ethan Alter [NYC Film Critic ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Sara M. Fetters [MovieFreak ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Daniel Fienberg [Zap2it ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Duane Dudek [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Barry Paris [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Jeff Vice [Deseret News, Salt Lake City ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Tim Knight [Reel ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Ed Blank [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ]
  • 2 of 4 Reviewed by Jeremiah Kipp [Slant Magazine ]
  • Reviewed by Kirk Honeycutt [The Hollywood Reporter ]
  • Reviewed by Emmy Chahal [Georgia Straight ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image