Every Breath You Take Reviews

  • Every Breath You Take
    • Genre : Thriller,Psychological
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : R
    • Duration : 105 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : -
    • Studio : Vertical Entertainment
    • Official Site : -
    • Reviews Rate
      Not quite bad, but it's not recommended either.

    • Readers Rate

Movie Reviews

  • this cross of a home invasion thriller meets campy stalker flick lacks a sufficient amount of surprises to make this airless venture worth the hassle. If not for a sadistically game performance by Sam Claflin, this film would be dead on arrival
    Review rate : C- by Nate Adams [The Only Critic ]
  • the movie coasts on so many tropes that you almost expect it to subvert them, but the plot remains equally foreseeable; With only a few fleeting moments of nail-biting thrills, "Every Breath You Take" remains mostly tepid and frustrating
    by Kristen Yoonsoo Kim [New York Times ]
  • it's a fairly entertaining popcorn picture. Cassey Affleck and Michelle Monaghan are all pro, India Eisley is properly emotionally mixed up, and Sam Claflin shows a side he hasn't gotten to do before in movies. It is all very slick and watchable
    by Pete Hammond [Deadline ]
  • for a thriller that's overly designed and under-scripted, it's got the twists and good actors to carry you along
    by Owen Gleiberman [Variety ]
  • beyond its overqualified cast and eyebrow-raising plot points, this pedestrian psychological revenge thriller offers few surprises
    by David Rooney [The Hollywood Reporter ]
  • "Every Breath You Take" is a stalker thriller without thrills or stakes; Sam Claflin is best in show, but his performance is undercut by the film's inability to escalate or explore the ramifications of its premise
    1 of 4 by Chuck Bowen [Slant Magazine ]
  • "Every Breath You Take" does have a solid cast, but they're wholly wasted. So too is any and all potential for this to be an entertaining picture. Not a single moment is earned; This flick is utterly forgettable, and rather poor
    1.5 of 4 by Joey Magidson [Awards Radar ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image